Skip to content

Criminal Defense Attorney Phoenix Immigration Consequences

In the case of Padilla v. Kentucky, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a 7-2 decision that “[i[t is quintessentially the duty of counsel to provide his/her client with the available advice about an issue like deportation” and the failure to do so satisfies the first prong of the Strickland analysis regarding ineffective assistance of counsel. In other words a criminal defense attorney Phoenix must notify their client regarding issues of whether or not a plea carries immigration consequences. The court held that “counsel must inform their client whether his or her plea carries a risk of deportation.”

Justice Stevens even provides a practice tip and encourages criminal defense attorneys in Phoenix and other lawyers to consider immigration consequences when engaging in plea-bargaining and to do so creatively.

The Padilla decision simply reinforces existing law in states like New Mexico where counsel already has the responsibility to determine if a client is a citizen, determine the immigration consequences of the crime with which the client is charged and inform the client. But in those states that only found ineffective assistance of counsel where there was clearly incorrect advice regarding immigration consequences or though immigration consequences were collateral to the criminal defense attorney Phoenix case and therefore are not worthy of ineffective assistance analysis, this landmark decision in the Padilla case does expand the duties of criminal defense attorneys in Phoenix and nationwide.

Continue reading

Gender Differences In Criminal Behavior

Crimes committed by women differ from criminality done by men by the nature of a crime, and its consequences, as well as by methods, crime weapon, and choice of victim. It is hard to object that crimes committed by women have more emotional characteristic then those committed by men.
Women are far less likely than men to commit crime and this pattern seems to hold true all over the world. Only 19% of known offenders are women. Nevertheless, women are far more likely to experience domestic violence. Two women are murdered every week by their current or former partner and 44% of violent incidents against women were domestic.

According to the stats of female offenders in prison most were in for drug, theft and handling stolen property offences, this accounted for 60% of known female offenders. 15% of sentenced female prisoners had previously been admitted to a psychiatric hospital and over 40% of sentenced women prisoners have been reported as being dependent on
drugs in the year before coming to prison. An estimated 20% of women in prison have spent some time in care.

Until recently, criminal behavior has been mostly discussed from a male perspective and has been about men, for men and by men. Various theories have shown why some women commit fewer crimes than males. Lombroso believed that women were evolutionarily inferior to men, a lower form of life. He hypothesized that the natural female criminal was perceived to have the criminal qualities of the male plus the worst characteristics of women. This appeared to indicate that criminal women were genetically more male than female, therefore biologically abnormal Freud (1925) offered an explanation of female crime that, women are universally not able to fully resolve the Oedipus complex, have a great deal of need for the approval of men, so as a rule they do not risk upsetting them by committing crimes. The exceptional female who does offend is seen as suffering from extreme penis envy and, in a desire to be a man, takes an aggressive, non-conforming attitude that may result in criminal behavior.
In addition, scientists have suggested that the brain differences between male and female is an essential reason why women are more likely to stay out of harms way. Current research has demonstrated that females, on average, have a larger deep limbic system than males. Due to this, women are more in touch with their feelings; they have an increased ability to bond and are connected to others.

Continue reading

Beloved Actors With A Criminal Past

Armed with menacing cameras, paparazzi keep fans abreast of nearly all celebrity indiscretions. Tabloid news shows detail the legal woes of Hollywood’s A-listers on a daily basis.

Criminal behavior among beloved actors is not saved for Hollywood’s youngest generation. Several established leading men possess criminal records. A sample of these men served time in prison before they were thrust into the spotlight.

Before Donning the Red Suit to Play Santa Clause, Tim Allen Donned Prison Stripes

Continue reading

Is Criminal Background Checking a Necessity

Conducting a criminal background check will cost employer and even landlords a great piece on their funds cartwheel. For employers, a simple background check is not enough to accept applicants likewise to landlords to its potential tenants. They must both need, at most cases, conduct criminal background checks. Perhaps the main reason for such is to be certain that what they hire to join the company or what they accept to live in their property is trustworthy just like what they claim on their resume, interview or with their appearance.

Other than that, what else are the possible and imperative grounds giving justice why a criminal background check is needed?

Heres a short list why:

Continue reading

Consequences Of Failure To Maintain Medical Records For New York Physicians

Maintaining medical records is one of the most important functions of a modern medical practice. Properly maintained records ensure smooth operations of the practice and significantly decrease malpractice liability or probability of a misconduct accusation. This article discusses various issues related to proper medical record maintenance by New York healthcare practitioners and potential consequences of failure to do so.

New York Education Law 6530(32) requires that all New York practicing physicians and other healthcare professionals maintain detailed records for each and single patient. Maintaining proper medical records is a professional responsibility of a New York doctor or another practitioner. Very basically, each patient’s record must accurately reflect the evaluation and treatment of the patient. There are two types of information that a medical record may contain. First, it is the actual patient information. Second, it is additional information that could not be released with the rest of the medical record. That includes some types of the physician’s personal notes and observations, information confidentially disclosed to the physician on condition that it would not be disclosed to anyone including the patient, information that relates to prior treatments by another practitioner if the patient is able to request this information from the other physician, and certain information subject to NY Mental Hygiene Law that relates to some types of mental health treatments. Maintenance and disclosure of New York Psychiatric medical records is separately controlled by the New York Mental Health Law section 33. New York Medicaid providers and hospitals are additionally subject to specific requirements of medical record keeping which are quite extensive.

New York demands that medical records be maintained for at least six years and in some cases even longer.

Continue reading